| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Community concerns raised over proposed wind farm
Credit: Gippsland times | 5 Oct 2018 | www.gippslandtimes.com.au ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Wellington Shire Council will ensure the state government hears the concerns of the local community regarding the Synergy Alberton wind farm proposal.
In its submission to the Planning Minister, council voted to give in-principle support for the development, however highlighted the concerns that would need to be addressed.
These concerns include noise, shadow flicker, proximity to the Yarram airfield, impacts on council’s road network, handling of complaints, the need for an Environmental Management Plan, the impact of current electrical infrastructure and the need for a plan for decommissioning should the proposal be approved by the government.
Council heard from two objectors.
Alberton farmer Neil Griffinn opposed the proposed wind farm.
“There’s about 168 people in the footprint expected to live with this low level white noise day after day after day, every time the wind blows,” he said.
“It would just drive you crazy, and the flicker, you know the flashing of the blades in the sunshine – that’s not good either.”
Gelliondale resident Graham James expressed concern the proposal ignored state regulation requiring wind turbines to be at least one kilometre from houses, pointing out Synergy’s calculations were at least 80 metres out, and that there were at least 13 house less than one kilometre from the extremities of a turbine.
He also questioned the modelling of turbine noise, and the lack of a comprehensive study of the local and migratory bird life.
Mayor Carolyn Crossley pointed out that while council was a supporter of green, renewable energy, it did not agree that it should come at a cost of reducing the liveability of communities.
“We can’t control the outcome,” she said.
“This decision is clearly in the hands of the state government, but we can put forward our community’s views and advocate on their behalf.”
Cr Crossley said council had received correspondence, representations and a petition from many people living in or close to the proposed site, advising that they opposed the wind farm application.
Council will ensure the minister receives all these objections, along with council’s own submission.
At its meeting on Tuesday, council resolved to seek the Planning Minister’s assurance that in the absence of a formal Environmental Effects Statement being required by the government, all specific concerns raised in submissions be thoroughly investigated and detailed responses provided.
Council will also provide a copy of all submissions it has received to Gippsland South MLA Danny O’Brien.
Council’s draft response to the minister is available in the council’s October 2 meeting agenda, on the council’s website.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=90149 ]
