LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Should Indiana have statewide zoning for wind turbines? General Assembly interim committee considers question 

Credit:  By Scott L. Miley, CNHI Statehouse Reporter | www.tribstar.com ~~

Indiana should not regulate statewide zoning requirements for wind turbine development, those in the industry said Thursday, despite requests from Hoosiers who favor state controls to assure consistency.

But the discussion in front of an Indiana General Assembly interim legislative committee on energy became at times a general debate about the merits of wind energy, particularly in rural areas where no zoning ordinances may be in effect.

Proponents of wind turbines cited economic benefits to local communities and asked that communities be allowed to determine zoning options. Opponents said the windmills devalue property and increase noise, among other concerns.

“I’ve lived in the same house for 60 years and I like to get to get up and see the sunrise, not a bunch of metal and things flying around,” Michael Thompson, a resident of Clinton County told the Interim Study Committee on Energy, Utilities, and Telecommunications.

Opposition from people like Thompson has stopped some wind turbine companies from being able to grow in Indiana. Now, lawmakers are weighing the rights of local government to limit turbine expansion and the desire to provide some uniformity to zoning to encourage industry growth.

On the other side was Bob Zahn, a board member with the Tipton County Foundation who cited financial benefits.

“I realize money is not everything, but it does take money to run a county,” he said. “I realize that change is difficult for many people … but do they have a revenue alternative if they’re able to defeat wind in these counties?”

Tipton County, which shares a wind farm with neighboring Madison County, has received more than $795,000 in property taxes and $1.2 million for economic development from the farm, said County Auditor Greg Townsend. Wind farm operator E.ON Climate and Renewables North America Inc. has also rebuilt 25 miles of roads, he said.

Bruce Buchanan, a farmer and a Benton County Council member, said income to the county from wind turbine farms has helped fund town and township projects.

“We would not have paramedics today if it were not for windmills,” he said.

Opponents urged the committee to push wind turbine firms to be more transparent in presenting projects to communities.

Last session, State Rep. Tom Saunders, R-Lewisville, introduced a bill that would establish a setback, initially 2,200 feet, from a dwelling where windmills could be set up. The bill would have established disclosure requirements for developers and set penalties for a public servant who committed a conflict of interest. The bill did not pass from committee.

Saunders said it might not have been a “a perfect bill” but he asked the committee to look into legislation clarifying requirements for notification by wind turbine companies to residents as well as considering consideration to address conflicts of interest among elected officials who could lease land to the companies and also vote on projects.

“What about the counties that have no local zoning?” Saunders asked the committee. “Do they not need some assistance to preserve their property rights?”

Two wind turbine proponents, both of whom lease land for windmills, are also elected officials. Steve Burton, a White County commissioner, spoke in favor of wind turbines, as did Buchanan.

Source:  By Scott L. Miley, CNHI Statehouse Reporter | www.tribstar.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon