LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Councillors accused of ignoring professionals on St Andrews University wind farm 

Credit:  By Cheryl Peebles | The Courier | November 18, 2016 | www.thecourier.co.uk ~~

Fife’s university has accused councillors of persistent unreasonable behaviour over its proposed wind farm as it fights for grid connection.

The University of St Andrews’ plans for six turbines at Kenly Farm were dealt yet another blow when Fife Council’s north east planning committee refused planning permission for an underground cable.

An appeal has now been lodged with the Scottish Government, which alleges councillors have consistently ignored their own professionals’ advice and demands expenses for the case are footed by the council.

Initially blocked by the same committee, the university won the go-ahead three years ago for creation of Kenly wind farm, a key element of its ambition to become the UK’s first carbon neutral campus.

However, the project has been thwarted at several turns, including a delay in agreeing with the Ministry of Defence how to prevent interference with radar at Leuchars – a stumbling block which the university has previously warned may prevent the 328ft turbines ever being built.

Since December 2012 the university has appealed to the government four times against decisions of the north east planning committee in relation to Kenly.

Another appeal relating to conditions of the turbine consent has been submitted simultaneously with the grid connection appeal.

The university’s agent Jones Lang LaSalle told the government’s Directorate for Planning and Environmental Appeals the latest matters should not have gone to Scottish ministers for determination.

It said: “The committee appear to have ignored the technical and planning evidence before them from the appellant and from the council’s own officer.

“The appellant has been put to considerable unnecessary expense as a result of the unreasonable actions of the council, which is a recurring theme for applications relating to the delivery of Kenly wind farm where officers’ and consultees’ professional opinions are being consistently ignored.”

The university applied for planning consent to run a 33,000 volt cable nine miles underground to carry power for its estates from Kenly, near Boarhills, via Stravithie, Lathockar and the A915 to a substation in the town.

There was a substantial number of objections to the proposal and in August councillors went against planners’ advice and refused consent due to concerns about traffic disruption, residential amenity and what they said was insufficient information about protection of trees.

The university’s appeal claims the route was selected from three options following discussions with council officers, partly because it avoided the busy A917 into St Andrews.

It also argued two assessments had considered impact on trees, which it said would be protected through a construction management plan.

Futhermore, it insisted there would be no significant disruption to residents and there was no evidence that road disruption would be so significant to impact on local businesses.

In September a government reporter overturned a decision of the committee and allowed work short of turbine erection to be carried out at Kenly ahead of radar mitigation measures being agreed.

The council is yet to respond to the appeal and committee chair Councillor Frances Melville declined to comment.

Source:  By Cheryl Peebles | The Courier | November 18, 2016 | www.thecourier.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky