LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

News Watch Home

PSC approves Mark Twain line, county remains in opposition 

Credit:  By Eric Dundon, Hannibal Courier-Post managing editor | Apr. 28, 2016 | www.hannibal.net ~~

Marion County’s stance opposing a proposed power line running from the Palmyra area west remains intact despite a decision this week by the Missouri Public Service Commission to approve the project.

The PSC voted 5-0 in favor of the Mark Twain Transmission Project – a 95-mile, 345,000-volt transmission line project from Palmyra to Kirksville and north to the Missouri-Iowa border submitted by Ameren Transmission Company of Illinois (ATXI).

The PSC’s unanimous approval of a certificate of convenience and necessity (CCN) to construct the line came with one major caveat – ATXI must first get the nod from the commissions of the five counties in the transmission line’s path.

So far, the county commissions haven’t welcomed the project.

Marion County, on the urging of residents in the western part of the county, has opposed the project since 2014.

“Right now our constituents have asked us to oppose it and that’s where we’re at,” Lyndon Bode, the county’s presiding commissioner, said.

While Bode is still unconvinced, he conceded the door is still open.

“I think probably our stance would stand unless convinced otherwise, and that’s why I want to read what the Public Service Commission said and see if Ameren wants to talk to us more, which I think they will,” Bode said, “just see what they say and see what they’ve done to work with the neighbors and individuals they’d be getting easements from.”

Bode remains open-minded, but other government leaders along the proposed path bluntly rejected the idea.

“That will probably happen as soon as hell freezes over,” Mark Thompson told the Kirksville Daily Express, a sister paper of the Courier-Post, on the likelihood that the Adair County Commission would change its mind.

Along with Marion County, ATXI will need to get consent from the commissions in Shelby, Knox, Adair and Schuyler Counties. According to a press release from the PSC, its own rules dictates that ATXI must get consent. However, the PSC noted that a reviewing court may overturn that requirement.

“We will also work diligently with the counties to help them understand this project, its local benefits and that we satisfy the statutory requirements and meet all standards and codes that govern the design and construction of the project,” Jim Jontry, Senior Project Manager for the Mark Twain Transmission Project, said.

In its decision, the PSC said the project could open the door for more wind energy in Northeast Missouri.

“ATXI has shown a need for Mark Twain, qualifications to own and operate it, the financial ability to build it, the economic feasibility of building it, and the public interest that would be served by building it,” the commission said.

Some property owners raised health concerns and claimed the power line would violate a 2014 Missouri constitutional amendment creating a right to farm by taking land out of production.

The PSC said health concerns are unfounded and the power poles would not significantly affect farming.

“We will work with individual landowners on environmental studies, surveying and the easement process,” Jontry said.

Northeast Missouri is no stranger to controversial power projects. The PSC denied a CCN to Clean Line Energy in 2015, which sought to construct the Grain Belt Express, which would have passed through Ralls County.

Source:  By Eric Dundon, Hannibal Courier-Post managing editor | Apr. 28, 2016 | www.hannibal.net

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon