Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Charity should stay clear of wind debate
Credit: The Courier | 11 February 2016 | www.thecourier.co.uk ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Has WWF Scotland stopped looking after wildlife in favour of supporting wind turbines and protesting about climate change?
There are enough people, organisations, pressure groups and propaganda machines already doing this.
Lang Banks, since he took over as director of WWF Scotland, has been firing off press releases and newspaper articles on a monotonous basis.
The latest of many was that wind power output in January was 48% of Scotland’s total electricity consumption (February 8).
What he is not saying is that on wind-free days, no homes would be supplied from wind generation.
What he is not saying is that the rest was supported by coal, gas and nuclear which is needed when the wind does not blow.
What he is not saying is that wind electricity is much more expensive.
What he is not saying is that Scotland has a miniscule 0.13% of global emissions and the whole point of expensive, intermittent turbines was to reduce CO2 but this has not happened.
Does WWF now stand for world wind fantasy?
Clark Cross.
138 Springfield Road,
Linlithgow.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: