LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Offshore windfarm cables to be diverted to protect farmland 

Credit:  24 February 2015 | www.thecourier.co.uk ~~

Cabling associated with multi-million-pound offshore windfarms will likely be rerouted to protect Angus farmland.

The infrastructure is associated with the Seagreen Alpha and Bravo developments planned east of Angus, which were among four offshore windfarms granted Scottish government consent last October.

The Forth and Tay region schemes will have enough generating capacity to power 1.4 million homes, with Seagreen involving up to 150 turbines and a capacity of 1,050 megawatts.

In November, Angus Council granted permission in principle for the electrical transmission infrastructure, which incorporates a cabling route between Carnoustie and Tealing, and although the exact route is yet to be determined councillors are being asked to consider a change in the vicinity of Balhungie Farm near Carnoustie to avoid poly-tunnelling and irrigation infrastructure.

The council’s head of planning and place, Vivien Smith, said: “Angus Council has granted planning permission for a cable route extending from the foreshore at Carnoustie to a proposed substation site at Tealing, and that permission remains extant.

“This application seeks permission for a realignment of a small section of that overall route.

“While the development would give rise to a number of environmental and amenity impacts, I do not consider the impacts associated with the realigned route would be any greater than those associated with the approved route.”

She added: “The applicant has indicated that should permission be granted for the alternative route subject of this application, it would be implemented alongside the extant permission for the larger route following approval of all matters specified in conditions.

“Whilst the proposed realigned route is acceptable, I do not consider that it would be desirable to have a situation whereby the work and environmental impacts associated with both routes could occur in the vicinity of Balhungie.”

Source:  24 February 2015 | www.thecourier.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky