LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Business battles turbine plan 

A business is launching yet another fight against plans for a wind farm which could bring an end to its operations.

Peterlee Parachute Centre fears it might have to put a stop to jumps at its airfield in Shotton Colliery if the go-ahead is given to build the turbines at Edder Acres farm.

Centre boss Ian Rosenvinge is preparing to lodge his objection to the two 110metre structures being built, with parachutists also launching online petitions in the hope of putting a stop to the development.

Letters have also been submitted from skydiving fans from as far away as Banbury and London against the plan, which would see the turbines built within 1.5
miles of the centre site.

However, the family which owns the farm has says application put in by A7 Energy has won the support of locals.

The Musgraves, who have lived on the farm since 1939, said they were “devastated” when the plan was not approved when it was first submitted in October 2005 and needed it to keep the business going.

Mr Rosenvinge told the Echo: “I have sympathy with the Musgraves, but unfortunately I’ve got to stick to my guns or it could have a drastic effect on us.”

He added that new hangers were planned for the site, that £16,000 had recently been spent on improving the access road to the airfield.

But Norma Musgrave, who lives at Edder Acres Farm with her family, said: “The people are for it again because they are absolutely sick to death of the aeroplanes.

“It’s not that we want to put him out of business, that’s not the purpose of it.”

Sunderland Echo

21 August 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky