LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

After 381 complaints windfarm is refused 

A CONTROVERSIAL proposal for a windfarm to be built near Talgarreg has collapsed after Ceredigion planners rejected the application after nearly three hours of heated debate.

The development would have seen 10 wind turbines standing 100 metres high at Rhosygarn but members of the county council’s develop-ment committee rejected the scheme because they felt there were too many windfarms in Ceredigion.

They decided to refuse the application despite officers raising no objections and claims by the developers and landowners involved that it would benefit the local community.

Cllr Fred Williams said: “We have all done our bit for renewable energy and I think we must come to a stop.

“We have done enough for wind energy in Ceredigion I wonder if the government would accept wind turbines on the white cliffs of Dover.”

“If you look at the history of Wales we have paid too much already.

“Our water has been taken, our Valleys have been robbed of coal, big brother across the boarder has spoken too often.”

The planning committee were eager to point out their support for renewable energy but it seemed that the underlining argument was that Ceredigion’s wind energy potential has already been abused.

Cllr Meurig James said: “I am a great advocator of renewable energy. “Wind energy is just one way of producing renewable energy and with four wind farms already here there is no doubt that Ceredigion is leading the way.

“How much room is there for wind farms.

“Enough is enough, why should Caeredigion have to answer the pollution problem of the 21st century when our rural area is not at fault.”

Members of the local community were present at the meeting and one representative from local residents addressed the committee with con-cerns of noise pollution and visual implications.

Cllr James added: “The people of this area have made a democratic choice to reject this proposal.

“We have received 381 letters of complaint and 23 letters of approval for this proposal and that shows a democratic choice.

“It is important that we represent the public and remember that our policies are there to serve the public.”

A small number of councillors backed the development addressing the importance of sup-porting renewable energy but a recorded ballot saw the wind farm rejected with a seventeen votes to two against the development.

The company behind the scheme Renewable Energy Systems (RES) are already considering an appeal after the decision, which was made against the advice of planning officers and despite the fact that there were no statutory objections from official bodies. As a result RES have claimed that communities will lose out to the tune of at least £40,000 a year from money that could have been used to pull down further grants, so the actual loss could be far greater. It is also claimed that Ceredigion County Coun-cil itself will also lose at least £2 million in business rates.

RES’s project manager, David Cox said: “We are extremely disappointed because we are con-vinced that the wind farm at Rhos Garn, between Lampeter and Aberaeron, is an excellent proposal.

“We have been working on it with local farmers and have received widespread support from many parts of the community.”

“This is also a blow to the future of life in rural Wales.

“We believe that wind energy is one of the best ways for farmers to make new use of their land and find new sources of income, helping them to survive.”

by Sion Morgan cnewssion@12freeukisp.co.uk

Copyright Tindle Newspapers Ltd 21 September 06

lampeter-today.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky