LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Appeal over wind farm substation 

bbc.co.uk

The consortium planning to build the world’s largest offshore wind farm is appealing against the refusal of permission for an onshore substation.

The proposed substation at Cleve Hill, Graveney, Kent, forms part of the £1.5bn London Array scheme to site 270 wind turbines off the Thanet coast.

Swale Borough Council refused planning consent in June, citing environmental impact as the reason.

Andrew Murfin, of London Array, said Cleve Hill remained the best location.

Impact on community

“We firmly believe this is an excellent project, and the Cleve Hill remains the only location that minimises environmental concerns while meeting the necessary technical criteria for such a critical element of the project,” he said.

The substation is needed to bring the electricity ashore to feed into the national grid.

If built, it would supply enough clean energy to meet the electricity consumption of every house in Kent and East Sussex.

Mark Bilsborough, of Swale Borough Council, said on Tuesday that although it was an exciting project and that Swale was not against change, significant local concerns remained.

‘Concerns addressed’

He said 60 heavy lorry movements a day for five years through a small village on winding country lanes “was too much for a small rural community to take”.

He said: “If London Array can satisfy the local community in Graveney that the disruption caused by such a major infrastructure will be minimised – and that the compensation package they have put together is adequate – then they will have a much better chance of getting their project approved.”

London Array said it had now amended its proposals, after listening to local residents, to address concerns over the impact of construction traffic and the visual impact of the substation.

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky