LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind turbine appeal is dismissed 

An appeal brought by an energy company wanting to install eight wind turbines in Lincolnshire has been dismissed.

Your Energy appealed to the Planning Inspectorate after its application was deferred by West Lindsey District Council for a third time in 2007.

But an independent inspector ruled the turbines would cause “significant damage” to the landscape at Laughton.

Your Energy’s managing director Richard Mardon said the company was undertaking a legal review of the report.

‘Unacceptable damage’

“We are stunned by this decision,” said Mr Mardon.

“The tragedy here is that a wind farm that could provide 7,500 households’ worth of clean electricity will not be built because of the landscape that the project itself is trying to protect.”

In the report, the planning inspector stated: “Schemes such as this one should be permitted unless their impact would result in “significant harm” to the landscape, visual amenities or similar environmental damage.

“I have found this proposal would entail “significant adverse effects” throughout the landscape sub-unit identified around Laughton and seriously undermine a key characteristic of the “undulating farmland” landscape to the East.

“In addition, the turbines would unacceptably damage the character of Laughton and the setting of its Grade I listed church…I conclude that such damage would entail significant harm.”

Your Energy first submitted plans for the wind turbines in 2004. The first 10-turbine project was rejected and plans were resubmitted with eight wind turbines.

BBC News

23 April 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky