LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Cohasset board revises proposed regulation for commercial-grade wind turbines 

Planning board limits setback requirement to residential districts

The Cohasset Planning Board has modified a proposed regulation for wind turbines to make it less restrictive.

The change could affect one developer’s plans to erect commercial-grade wind turbines on a ridge behind Graham Waste Services Inc. at 215 Chief Justice Cushing Highway.

The site reportedly is controlled by Paul S. Barry Jr., operator of Graham Waste Services, through a realty trust.

The change concerns a turbine’s so-called drop zone or fall zone.

As drafted, the regulation would require that the distance from the base of a turbine tower to the site’s property lines at least equal the structure’s height.

The idea for the safety-zone setback is that in the unlikely case of a turbine tower toppling, it would not fall onto someone else’s property.

But Andrew Willard, chairman of the alternative energy committee, said one of two proposed turbine sites on the Barry-controlled land could not meet that requirement. If that tower fell, it could extend onto the neighboring Hingham Lumber property, he said.

The developer wants to avoid putting turbines on the closed former Cohasset Heights landfill, Willard said.

Willard’s committee has prepared the regulation to try to streamline the town’s wind turbine approval process for commercial-size turbine projects – those greater than 500 kilowatts. The planning board, which would be the permitting authority, is sponsoring the regulation that is slated for action at the annual town meeting March 29.

Alternative energy committee member Dr. Michael Bliss said a turbine developer could ask the zoning board of appeals for a variance from the setback requirement.

But three planning board members decided to make it easier by amending the proposed regulation to limit the fall-zone setback requirement to residential districts.

Willard said his committee will meet with selectmen on the proposed regulation next Monday.

The Patriot Ledger

4 March 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky