LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm objectors vindicated over noise 

Your headline “Fight against turbines gets legal go-ahead” (July 10) was not only welcome news for Den Brook Valley, but almost a situation whereby RES, the developers should be congratulated on having admitted that noise is a real issue.

How strange it is, after 18 years of non-stop applications and total denial that noise is a problem, that wind farm opponents are being proved correct in their own peer-reviewed papers and research results.

When a joint meeting of Restormel and North Cornwall Councils with the public before the development of Bears Down wind farm was held, the health and safety officers and NWP were adamant there would be “no noise problems whatsoever” and that they could wave magic wands and solve anything.

This is one of the wind farms the DTI (now BERR) with selected acousticians, (who work for both sides providing there is money in it) chose to stay clear of, probably knowing it is a problem for local residents, and then proceeded to come up with fanciful reports to cover their own backs.

In the Den Brook article, it states “Rachel Ruffle of RES said “we took great care to design the wind farm so that it would not be a noise nuisance”. So there we have it; they know problems arise over and over again, but if they think they can design a wind farm without problems, it will probably have to be put underground.

It is ironic that EON has just scrapped wind farm plans at Ferndown in Scotland due to expected noise problems. Are they all suddenly being honest? I doubt it; more like running out of money now that the truth about noise and health is reaching the top of the agenda.

Alan J Nunn

St Austell

Western Morning News

15 July 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky