LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Blowback doesn't taint wind pact 

Credit:  The Topeka Capital-Journal, cjonline.com 22 May 2011 ~~

Gov. Sam Brownback has caught some blowback for helping make more of the Flint Hills off-limits to wind power development, but the governor still deserves support for the measure.

After Brownback unveiled an agreement to double the size of a protected area in the Flint Hills, officials in Elk and Cowley counties announced that the deal killed a proposed BP wind farm project in their region. They criticized the governor for not consulting with them before finalizing the agreement.

But while it’s easy to see why leaders in the two counties would be disappointed in seeing the door close on an economic opportunity, their possible loss doesn’t outweigh the benefits of protecting the Flint Hills.

Notice that word, “possible.” As Brownback pointed out, BP had stated it was considering abandoning its plan before the Flint Hills deal was announced. Further, the governor suggested the company was interested in expanding its operations elsewhere, and he expressed a commitment to work with local officials.

As one of the last remaining expanses of the prairie that once covered much of the Midwest, the region is a priceless asset for Kansas. It’s our version of mountains or beaches, and the partners in the protection agreement – including Westar Energy, landowners and environmental groups – have recognized the need to keep it in pristine condition.

It’s too bad the agreement couldn’t have gone over without a hitch. But it was still the right thing to do.

Source:  The Topeka Capital-Journal, cjonline.com 22 May 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky