LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Councillors agree to give wind farm applicant more time to consider Fife Airport safety concerns 

Credit:  By Claire Warrender, The Courier, www.thecourier.co.uk 21 April 2011 ~~

Plans for a wind farm condemned as a major safety hazard for planes using Fife Airport have been put on hold.

An independent safety report ordered by Fife Council concluded the proposal at the former Westfield opencast site near Kinglassie could have tragic consequences if an inexperienced pilot lost altitude.

However, as the report was completed recently, applicant Infinis Ltd said it had not had enough time to consider it properly.

The council’s planning committee agreed this week that the application should not be discussed as planned, but should be postponed until its next meeting in June.

Planners recommended the application for five turbines be refused, with development manager Jim Birrell stating, “There would be a significant impact on the safe operation of the airfield and therefore the application is unacceptable.”

He added that safety was the only issue, as other matters did not create any significant problems.

Airport owners Tayside Aviation appointed a consultant who concluded the turbines were not appropriate.

However an independent report for the applicant claimed there would be no detrimental impact on aviation safety for flights into and out of the airport.

Fife Council received 112 letters of representation in relation to the application – four in support and the rest against.

Source:  By Claire Warrender, The Courier, www.thecourier.co.uk 21 April 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky