LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind turbines split stock, game farmers 

Credit:  DAVID MACGREGOR, Daily Dispatch, www.businesslive.co.za 4 March 2011 ~~

A proposal to build hundreds of wind turbines near Grahamstown has divided a small farming town.

In the grip of a severe drought for the past three years, cash-strapped livestock farmers in Riebeek East say a potential deal to lease portions of their land to Renewable Energy Systems Southern Africa may save them from bankruptcy.

But while dozens of farmers see the wind turbine scheme as a goose that could lay a golden egg, their game-ranching neighbours – who rely on tourism to earn their money – are convinced any additions to the rural skyline will negatively impact their businesses.

A handful of farmers heckled two opponents of the scheme – who own land in the area, but live in Cape Town – during a scoping report meeting in the sleepy farming hamlet on Wednesday night.

“You have come here to interfere. All you do on your land is breed jackals, you do not even employ people,” one burly farmer claimed.

Earlier, Bok Dam owner Andre van der Spuy told meeting facilitator Shawn Johnston of Sustainable Futures ZA that the scheme would adversely affect his farm – which he had set up for eco-tourism and nature pursuits.

Claims that the process initiated by RES was illegitimate were denied by Johnston.

Van der Spuy also claimed the contracts farmers had signed with RES were “potentially unfair”, and urged the company to publicly disclose its turnover and profit.

Nearby landowner Johnny de Beer – who operates a game farm – said he had invested in what he thought was a “pristine area” and was concerned the visual impact would affect the “ambience” of his investment.

Concerns about the impact of up to 200 turbines on local birdlife by another resident – Kathleen Bethune – would have to be studied in depth during the environmental impact assessment phase.

Responding, Savannah SA environmental consultant Jo-Anne Thomas, who is working on the proposal with RES, admitted that the impact of turbines on South African birdlife was still unknown.

She said, however, the area was home to a “number of birds of concern”, including the endangered blue crane.

These issues would be studied in depth during the EIA phase.

Concerns of the “accumulative effect” of hundreds of turbines on the environment – just one of many similar schemes between East London and Port Elizabeth – were noted by Johnston.

According to the presentation, RES ran similar projects throughout the world that currently produced 5000 megawatts of clean energy.

The Riebeek East scheme – using turbines up to 120m high – would generate 600MW for South African consumption. Johnston said that for every megawatt of energy, 13jobs were created.

If everything goes according to plan, the EIA will be completed this year and the project operational in 2017, if approved by government.

Although several game ranch operators throughout the Eastern Cape have expressed opposition to wind turbines near their operations, they were not at the meeting.

Johnston admitted this group was “very critical of the project”.

Source:  DAVID MACGREGOR, Daily Dispatch, www.businesslive.co.za 4 March 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky