LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Better late than never 

Credit:  Sun Journal, www.sunjournal.com 23 January 2011 ~~

There are bills to be considered in the Maine Legislature re-considering industrial wind power. There are reasons to support those bills:

Money. These are huge public works projects approved by the Legislature very quickly with very little public input, and without the cost/benefit analysis one expects. Taxpayers are paying companies to take the tops off mountains, build new roads and huge power lines, then they sell the power. Sweet deal for them; how about us?

Pollution. Besides the noise, flashing lights at night, visual and groundwater pollution and damage to wild lands, there’s all the pollution involved in construction. Cement, for instance, is a large source of mercury. All this for a supposedly “green” industry.

High-tensile power lines. Not just ugly, they’re a possible cancer risk from EMF radiation, and they hurt property values.

Bird strikes. These have recently been shown to be about 60 times greater than industry estimates. From eagles to songbirds, that’s a lot of dead birds.

Bat strikes. Even worse; in fact, with bat populations crashing, there should probably be an investigation and/or moratorium under the Endangered Species Act.

Is this a grab bag? Maybe, but they’re all questions the Maine legislators should have considered before putting industrial wind on the fast track.

Better late than never.

Instead of the short-term construction jobs, we could use that money to convert old textile mills. Maine could be the Saudi Arabia of solar panel production, using in-river hydropower.

Now that would be true green energy.

Sally McGuire, Carthage

Source:  Sun Journal, www.sunjournal.com 23 January 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky