LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind report omits major issues; Report on proposed law contains no suggestions on noise, setbacks 

Credit:  By MATT MCALLISTER, JOHNSON NEWSPAPERS, www.watertowndailytimes.com 15 November 2010 ~~

MORRISTOWN – When the Morristown Wind Committee presented the Town Council with its proposed wind energy law in May, the document lacked noise standards and setback distances.

The board then turned to its consultants, LaBella Associates, to address the issues committee members said they didn’t feel qualified to address.

Now, six months later, LaBella has turned its version of the wind energy law to the town filled with suggestions – none of which addresses noise or setbacks.

“Before suggestions for the completion of this section can be offered, further discussion with the committee or with the board will be necessary to understand the town’s intent,” wrote Mark W. Tayrien, LaBella’s planning director.

“Simply put, given the residential density typically found in upstate N.Y., there is no feasible way to simply compute an appropriate setback or constraint that would be acceptable in all instances,” he wrote. “What could be seen as too strict in one community could just as easily be viewed as too lenient in another.”

Town Supervisor Frank L. Putman said the board now has to address those issues without the benefit of recommendations from either the wind committee or consultants.

“They’re in effect saying that these are areas that are going to be specific to our community and that they want us to put something in the law for them to review,” Mr. Putman said. “We, in our brain, thought that LaBella would make suggestions for the establishment of these two factors. This leaves us with that to decide.”

Faced with few options, Mr. Putman said, the town will now look at “similar laws that are working in other places.”

The town paid LaBella $3,500 for its consulting services.

No meetings or hearings have been scheduled to continue work on the wind law, though the Town Council next meets at 7 p.m. Dec. 14.

Source:  By MATT MCALLISTER, JOHNSON NEWSPAPERS, www.watertowndailytimes.com 15 November 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky