LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Michigan Supreme Court rules in favor of wind transmission line application 

Credit:  Author: Staff Writer | Source: Gongwer News Service | Monday, April 01, 2013 | www.mitechnews.com ~~

LANSING – In an order, the Michigan Supreme Court has ruled unanimously approving a Public Service Commission decision allowing for the siting and construction of a wind energy transmission line.

The decision reversed in part a decision of the Court of Appeals that the PSC, and a 2008 act requiring minimum alternative energy generation in Michigan, violated the Constitution by altering and amending a 1995 act that sets requirements on making decision for construction of electric transmission lines.

The Supreme Court was asked to hear the case In Re. Application of International Transmission Company for Expedited Siting Certificate (SC docket No. 146386). Instead it issued its decision in the order.

Last November, the Court of Appeals held in the case that provisions in the 2008 law, PA 295, that require at least 10 percent of the state’s electrical generation come from alternative energy by 2015, are unconstitutional because it revises or amends a 1995 act that specifically sets conditions for approving construction of power plants and transmission lines.

In the case, the Public Service Commission approved ITC’s request for an expedited decision to site and build a transmission line for wind generated electricity. The Court of Appeals held the 2008 law allowed for both siting and construction approval, but that it did not specifically amend a section of the 1995 that states that act, PA 30 of 1995, will control the process to approve construction of plants and transmission lines.

In looking at the facts and arguments in the case, it rejected the arguments of the opponents in the matter, and held its ruling would have prospective application, and allowed the PSC order in the case to stand.

The Supreme Court, in its order, said the 2008 act is “an act complete in itself” and the expedited siting certificate “clearly intends construction of approved transmission lines.” It does not violate the Constitution, the court said, and the PSC’s ruling is upheld.

The Supreme Court issued the order on Thursday.

Source:  Author: Staff Writer | Source: Gongwer News Service | Monday, April 01, 2013 | www.mitechnews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky