LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind turbine noise still audible 

Credit:  Sussex Express | 29 March 2013 | www.sussexexpress.co.uk ~~

I assume that your article ‘Wind turbine hailed as beacon for the future’ (March 15) was based upon a Glyndebourne press release which in turn was intended to counter a highly critical article in Private Eye on February 22: ‘Music & Musicians – yet more sour notes from the South Downs’ by their opera buff ‘Lunchtime O’Boulez’.

The green spin within Glyndebourne’s claims deftly avoids discussing the pitiful electrical output. Based upon 2012 we now know that they over-stated actual turbine output by a massive 60 per cent when gaining approval to build in our national park. They also dodge the issue of the huge financial returns to Glyndebourne – over 17 per cent, tax free and guaranteed for 20 years – via subsidies paid for by pensioners and other consumers (Tony Parker, letters, January 18).

Mr Christie, Glyndebourne’s chief executive, boasts of an average wind speed of 5.68 metres per second. This equates to 12.7 miles per hour (mph). Mr Christie failed to explain that electrical output for the E44 turbine is negligible below 10 mph!

On the noise issue, Ringmer LibDem District Councillor, Professor Emeritus Peter Gardiner, declares himself “proud to be associated with [the] turbine [and] … Noise has not been proved to be a public nuisance”.

By contrast, your readers will recall that the same councillor assured us, both at the Lewes District planning meeting and via this column, on the basis of his academic credentials, that the turbine would not be heard in our village.

On January 16, 2012, Mr Gardiner himself admitted hearing turbine noise at a distance of 1,000 metres! Indeed he emailed senior Lewes planning officers stating: “I am extremely disappointed ….. especially with all the assurances I was given and that I passed on to Ringmer residents.”

The Glyndebourne – LibDem coalition is still going strong. Despite the consistent ‘whump-whump’ noise reports from residents in at least three separate locations within Ringmer, the FAQ section of the Glyndebourne website continues to assert that ‘It will not be possible to hear the turbine from Ringmer’ – Source: http://glyndebourne.com/wind-turbine-faqs. I rest my case.

Reg Keeping

Ringmer

Source:  Sussex Express | 29 March 2013 | www.sussexexpress.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky