LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

AG taking close look at meetings complaint 

Credit:  BY DAVID GIULIANI | December 17, 2012 | www.saukvalley.com ~~

DIXON – Many people attending zoning hearings on a wind farm proposal say Lee County isn’t providing sufficient minutes on the proceedings.

One resident filed a complaint with the state attorney general, contending the county was violating the Open Meetings Act.

But county officials say they’re doing nothing wrong, merely following Robert’s Rules of Order, which are the traditional rules governing meetings.

This week, the attorney general decided to investigate the complaint, giving the county 7 working days to respond.

When the hearings for the wind farm started in July, the county got full transcripts from a court reporter who is working for the wind energy company, Ireland-based Mainstream Renewable Power.

However, the county decided against putting the hearing transcripts online until early September.

Chris Henkel, the county’s zoning administrator, let visitors to his office look at the transcripts, but then-State’s Attorney Henry Dixon denied a public records request from resident Frances Mitchell to see the transcripts. He referred Mitchell to the court reporter, who would have charged more than $1,000 for the documents.

Mitchell complained to the attorney general, who issued an opinion saying Dixon should have released the transcripts because they were in the county’s custody.

Since September, the county has received no transcripts. A Mainstream representative said the county didn’t want the transcripts anymore, but the county said it would have had to pay for them.

In place of the transcripts, the county resumed its usual practice of taking minutes of its Zoning Board of Appeals hearings, but sharply scaled back what they included. For years, the zoning board gave detailed minutes of testimony. With the new version, the minutes included little other than the names of those cross-examining witnesses and the exact minute they end their cross-examinations.

Henkel, the zoning official, said that’s all the county needs to provide.

Mitchell and others disagreed.

In her complaint, Mitchell, a former Lee County assistant state’s attorney, pointed to a provision in the Open Meetings Act requiring “a summary of discussion on all matters proposed, deliberated, or decided, and a record of all votes taken.”

The attorney general’s office said the county’s response should clarify whether board members questioned witnesses at the meetings. If so, the agency wants the county to explain the nature of the questioning and whether members discussed the questions or answers given by the witnesses.

When Whiteside County held hearings for its part of the wind farm, it made transcripts available as soon as they became available. In that case, the county required Mainstream to pay for a court reporter, so the county didn’t have to incur the costs of doing its own minutes.

Lee County apparently made no similar requirement of Mainstream, although the company hired a court reporter anyway.

Dixon, the former state’s attorney, left office Nov. 30. Anna Sacco-Miller, who beat Dixon in a landslide in the November election, couldn’t be reached for comment Friday.

Source:  BY DAVID GIULIANI | December 17, 2012 | www.saukvalley.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky