LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Cottage renovation up in the air amid wind farm minefield 

Credit:  By Peter Collins | The Standard | Oct. 4, 2012, midnight | www.standard.net.au ~~

Bruce Allen fears he may be trapped in a legal minefield in trying to renovate a 125-year-old cottage on his Mortlake district property near a proposed wind farm.

The old weatherboard dwelling is only 1.3 kilometres from the closest turbine tower in Acciona’s 51-turbine project which gained a planning permit before a new state government ruling that there must be a two-kilometre buffer.

Mr Allen has another cottage and his farm house only 1.2km from a proposed tower.

He’s in a quandary fearing the new buffer limit puts him in a non-compliant zone which could make any work on his historic buildings legally doubtful.

“A lot of farmers won’t be aware they too could find themselves in this situation,” he said.

“Here I am trying to fix up the cottage and I may not be able to get a legal permit because now I’m in an non-compliant area.

“I refused to have wind farms on my property, yet I’m affected because of them being so close.

“If my farming rights are taken away then it’s bye-bye.”

Moyne Shire Council mayor Jim Doukas said he had been advised a building permit could be issued for Mr Allen because his cottage was there before the wind farm approval was granted.

“I understand that even if it burnt down he could get a permit to rebuild within two kilometres of a wind tower,” Cr Doukas said.

“It would be legal for him to extend or renovate, but he couldn’t build a new house inside the new limit.”

Mr Allen, who farms at Dornoch on the Mortlake-Framlingham Road, is one of five property owners who paid for independent noise tests hoping to be able to compare with Acciona’s data.

However, Acciona said its data machines broke down in the period when the independent tests were being done.

Negotiations are under way for more tests.

The company must begin work on the project by October 7 next year to avoid having the permit expire.

Another resident of the district said there were two proposed towers only about 200 metres from her family dairy shed.

She criticised what she described as secrecy by Acciona in negotiating with farm owners to host wind towers.

Source:  By Peter Collins | The Standard | Oct. 4, 2012, midnight | www.standard.net.au

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky