LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

County unlikely to reopen wind debate 

Credit:  Darrell Cole, www.cumberlandnewsnow.com 21 March 2012 ~~

UPPER NAPPAN – Cumberland County Warden Keith Hunter doubts his municipality is going to revisit its land-use bylaw regarding the location of wind turbines.

Reacting to news the Town of Amherst is going to ask the municipality to take another look at its setback regulations, the warden said the issue is something the county has already spent a considerable amount of time.

“We just finished that,” Hunter said. “We did a bylaw review and came up with new setbacks of 600 metres. In my view if it’s good for the county residents it’s good for the town residents.”

Hunter said the county looked at its bylaw in an effort to better protect county residents. The county held open houses across the county and got feedback from residents. He can’t see the municipality having one setback requirement for county residents and another for the town.

“If they were to be placed 600 metres away from any dwelling that’s far enough,” Hunter said. “When we first started our bylaw a few years ago we were thinking 300 metres. From all the research being done that was far enough to mitigate any flicker or noise. I’ve been less than 300 metres from the ones in Pubnico and there was no noise at all.”

Earlier this week, Amherst decided to send a letter to the county asking it to re-examine its regulations that have the minimum distance between wind turbines and habitable dwellings at 600 metres.

Hunter said the county will discuss the issue once it receives the town’s letter, but personally he can’t see his municipality reopening the process.

Source:  Darrell Cole, www.cumberlandnewsnow.com 21 March 2012

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky