LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Lawsuit filed against Kent Breeze Wind Farm 

Credit:  ELLWOOD SHREVE, The Daily News, www.chathamdailynews.ca 21 September 2011 ~~

TORONTO – A day after a local wind farm showcased its facility to the community, a family hit its parent company with a $1.5-million lawsuit.

The Michaud family claims that living near Suncor’s Kent Breeze Wind Farm, west of Thamesville, led to adverse health effects almost immediately after it started operating in the spring.

The Chatham Daily News spoke with family members Wednesday after a press conference in Toronto announcing the lawsuit.

The Michauds, who include parents Michel and Lisa and their two adult children, Elisha, 25, and Joshua, 20, say the symptoms they have felt include vertigo, nausea and sleep disruption that has resulted in emergency hospital visits and being prescribed medication.

“Nobody’s been sleeping for months,” said Lisa Michaud, 46.

She said she was the first to not feel well, noting, “I couldn’t even stand or walk.”

Then Michel, 53, started not feeling well, which he blames on the lack of sleep he’s been experiencing.

Michel, who operates his own construction business, said his son Josh began noticing something wrong with him because he was miserable and had been making mistakes.

He said he recently injured his thumb with a power nailer.

“I’ve been better,” he said. “I’m not happy.”

Lisa Michaud said her son can’t concentrate or play his musical instruments like he normally does. She added Elisha, 25, recently had two menstrual cycles in a month, which has never happened before.

“It’s been a real struggle,” Lisa Michaud said.

They built their dream home on Dew Drop Line after obtaining the property in 2005.

“We put our heart and soul in that place,” she said.

Michaud said they asked the company to either turn off the wind turbines or buy them another house so they can move.

The Daily News contacted Suncor Energy for comment, but little was forthcoming.

Jennifer Lomas, company spokesperson said, “because the statement of claim has been filed and it’s now a matter before the courts, I can’t talk about specifics or comment on our perspective.”

When asked if there is a concern this issue could snowball, she declined to speculate, noting the claim is being reviewed by Suncor’s legal team.

Suncor has five operating wind power facilities, including two in Ontario, two in Alberta and one in Saskatchewan.

Lomas said, “This is the only claim we’ve had.”

The Kent Breeze Wind Farm, the first project approved under Ontario’s Green Energy Act, was the subject of an Environmental Review Tribunal hearing last spring, which included testimony by two dozen experts.

Eric Gillespie, legal counsel for the Michaud family, said “the government and Suncor’s own experts said these kinds of effects would likely occur. They still went ahead.”

He added, “the claim is based on what appears to be obvious negligence.”

Gillespie noted the tribunal’s ruling stated for legal reasons, the test it applies it wouldn’t be able to do anything on this particular file, but did acknowledge wind turbines “can cause harm to human health.”

He added experts on all sides of the debate, all agree “if you go and talk to everybody in the community it’s not going to be everybody (who suffers symptoms).

“Unfortunately, in this case it happens to be the Michauds,” Gillespie said.

Source:  ELLWOOD SHREVE, The Daily News, www.chathamdailynews.ca 21 September 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky