LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Who says it’s green? 

Credit:  honoluluweekly.com 10 August 2011 ~~

The HW article [Aug. 3: “Interisland Dilemma”] states: “Big Wind seems to be an answer to all our environmental problems. But at what cost?”

The Big Wind project is based on unsubstantiated allegations, outright lies, misinformation and spin. Take for example 70 percent. What does that mean?

It does not mean seven of 10! The numerator is not a subset of the denominator in this case. The numerator is energy efficiency and renewable energy and heat from on-site generation. The denominator is utility electricity sold.

Suppose two coal plants were built on Kahoolawe. Each produced 3 MWh (2 units of heat and 1 unit of electricity). One was located in a DHHL building, and one was owned by MECO and its output sold to DHHL. Suppose DHHL consumed all 6 units of energy.

The renewable energy penetration level for Kahoolawe would be (2 units on-site heat produced) divided by (1 unit of utility electricity sold) = 2, i.e. 200 percent renewable.

Not clean, not green, not environmental, not common sense, but legal under state law.

HECO says Big Wind is green. A few years ago they tried to buy tropical biofuels grown on plantations where the landlords were required to be working toward “no child labor” and toward “free and prior informed concent of native people.”

HECO should not be the one who defines what is green.

Henry Curtis via [HonoluluWeekly.com]

Source:  honoluluweekly.com 10 August 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky