LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

County Board votes no on TIF district 

Credit:  Jeff Blankman Reporting, www.1380kcim.com 1 August 2011 ~~

Carroll, Iowa – The Carroll County Board of Supervisors voted 3-2 Monday morning not to move forward with the possible TIF on the two wind turbine fields in Northwest Carroll County. Supervisor Neil Bock led the discussion saying it would be a bad gamble and a financial risk he doesn’t want to put the county into. He says there is no guarantee what the state may do and if they will continue to back fill schools for TIF money lost”. Supervisor Gene Meiners then asked Bock if he believes Carroll County will eventually get backed into a corner to which Bock says he doesn’t think the county will. Board Chairman Marty Danzer says loads will continue to get heavier on gravel and paved county roads which he believes will place the county in a tough situation similar to other surrounding counties. He wondered what the county would do if federal money continues to be reduced. Supervisor Dan Nieland says he wants to do the projects that County Engineer Dave Paulson has listed but says they can do them with G.O Bonds. Supervisor Meiners believes the county could do the TIF and still have the flexibility to do a G.O bond if needed. Supervisor Mark Beardmore says the county is blessed and all those involved did their due diligence but says it’s about doing what’s right for all taxpayers. Danzer made a motion to move forward which was 2nd by Meiners. Nieland, Bock and Beardmore voted against and the motion failed 3-2.

Source:  Jeff Blankman Reporting, www.1380kcim.com 1 August 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky