LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind power debate is fuelled by greed 

I am in strong support of the stance taken by Tynedale Council to fight the current wave of applications for industrial wind turbines in the Kirkwhelpington area.

Thankfully, Tynedale Council had the intelligence not to be taken in by the “all windfarms are good” mantra so glibly abused by the companies who wish to make millions by erecting giant industrial turbines in the most environmentally ludicrous areas.

Anyone without a vested interest, who has taken the trouble to actually investigate remote onshore wind power stations, will not be asking why Tynedale is fighting them. They will want to know how such developments ever got this far in the first place.

Giant turbines in remote locations attempting to feed unpredictable, intermittent and fluctuating power to a distant grid connection would be a poor result in itself.

When you then consider that we need conventional power stations to continue burning fossil fuels to produce “shadow” power to cover the fluctuations it simply exposes such developments for what they truly are – greed disguised as green.

The ability of these companies to pronounce that their turbines – each of which are the size of a 40 storey building – will not destroy our beautiful landscape or our environment is not only an insult to the intelligence but also demonstrates how the prospect of vast profits can affect your vision.

The massive and irreversible harm inflicted upon the communities and industries such as tourism that these developments destroy cannot be justified and Tynedale’s stand to try and fight this madness must be applauded.

We need alternative forms of energy production, we need to reduce our energy demands. I agree that we need a mix of energy sources, but badly located schemes simply drain the available resources. It is extremely sad (but regrettably not surprising) that the environmental agenda has now been hijacked by marketing and large companies, a situation which creates an increasing air of cynicism around the whole debate.

G. GREEN,

Ridsdale

Hexham Courant

8 February 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky