LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

North Kingstown revokes turbine building permit — again 

Credit:  Andy Smith, Projo 7 to 7 News Blog, newsblog.projo.com 14 June 2011 ~~

NORTH KINGSTOWN, R.I. – For a second time, the town has revoked the building permit for a wind turbine proposed at the North Kingstown Green housing development off Ten Rod Road.

It’s one of two controversial turbines proposed for North Kingstown by Wind Energy Development LLC. The other is at Stamp Farm, off Route 2. The North Kingstown Green turbine had already been approved by the town.

In April, the town notified developer Mark DePasquale that the building permit was revoked because the necessary land transfers had not been completed. David Darlington, a spokesman for DePasquale, said the necessary paperwork had been filed and he had been told by town officials that the building permit would be reinstated.

On Tuesday, North Kingstown sent DePasquale a letter revoking the permit once more, this time requiring that Wind Energy Development provide the town with the make and model of the turbine, a revised site plan, and information regarding anticipated decibel levels. Darlington said Wind Energy Development plans to use 389-foot turbines made by Chinese manufacturer Goldwind at both sites, instead of 427-foot turbines from Danish company Vestas.

Darlington said Tuesday that DePasquale had only just received the town’s letter, and would have his attorneys look at it before deciding what to do next. Darlington said the town’s action was “an unveiled attempt” to appease citizens groups opposed to the turbines.

Source:  Andy Smith, Projo 7 to 7 News Blog, newsblog.projo.com 14 June 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky