Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Controversial wind turbine plans thrown out after inspector slams consultation ‘in a pub’
Credit: By Joel Cooper, Chief Reporter | Devon Live | 3 Feb 2020 | www.devonlive.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
A planning inspector has rejected an appeal to build a wind turbine in Devon after the applicant held a consultation “down the pub”.
Plans for the 15-metre high turbine at Eastlake Farm in Dolton, near Winkleigh, were originally submitted by Simon Paine back in December 2018.
38 people objected to the plans citing visual impact, a lack of economic benefit for the area and a ‘conflict’ with the local plan as their reasons.
The application was refused by Torridge District Council’s planners in April last year, but was taken to appeal with the Planning Inspectorate by Mr Paine.
However, last week the appeal was thrown out by the inspectorate for being invalid – with one of the main issues being the applicant’s definition of a public consultation.
In a letter last week, Inspector Philip James said: “In the opinion of the Inspector, a discussion with two neighbours in a pub is inadequate and falls considerably short of meeting the provisions of the GDPO/compliance with section 61W(1) of the 1990 Act.”
Mr James said that both the application and the appeal were “invalid” and that no further action would be taken on the appeal.
The Devon branch of the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) said they were delighted with the decision.
A spokesman said: “Many members of CPRE Devon objected to the application and the charity assisted in the writing of an appeal statement.
“The main reason for objection was that the application fell foul of the Joint North Devon & Torridge Local Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
“However, we were highly amused that the Planning Inspector turned down the appeal because a proper consultation is required by planning law and ‘a discussion with two neighbours in a pub is inadequate’.”
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
(via Paypal) |
(via Stripe) |
Share: