LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Terra-Gen wind energy official defends project as public blasts impacts 

Credit:  Project scaled back from 60 to 47 turbines along ridges | By Shomik Mukherjee | Redwood Times | November 7, 2019 | www.redwoodtimes.com ~~

As the controversial Terra-Gen wind energy project reached the Humboldt County Planning Commission table on Thursday for the first of a two-part public hearing, its numerous critics came out in full force, chorusing the project’s potential negative impacts as they filled the commission’s meeting chamber to the brim.

Terra-Gen proposes to build 47 wind turbines – down from an earlier plan of 60 turbines – on the Bear River and Monument Ridges above the town of Scotia in the Eel River Valley. The selling point is simple: Climate change is imminent and the wind farm would provide a crucial alternative to fossil fuels.

“This is an opportunity for Humboldt County to do something about global warming at a local level,” said Nathan Vajdos, the company’s senior director of wind development.

While Thursday’s meeting saw a Terra-Gen presentation, a round of commissioner questions and extensive public comment, the real deal will be a second public hearing on Nov. 14, when the commission is expected to make a decision on the wind turbines.

Regardless of the commission’s vote, the project can be appealed to the county Board of Supervisors at a later date.

Vajdos spoke at length Thursday to argue that Terra-Gen is far from a nefarious corporation. He touted the project’s zero emissions, reduction of greenhouse gases and upgrades to the county’s troubled energy infrastructure.

“Corporations are not popular in Humboldt County – let’s just acknowledge that – but we will immediately become the second-largest taxpayer in the county,” Vajdos said.

He did, however, concede that the turbines will be built on a site with Wiyot cultural resources, which he called a “significant and unavoidable” impact.

In response to the plan, the public had already voiced a long list of the project’s potential negative impacts, enough to prompt a litany of responses by the company in an over 800-page final environmental impact report.

At public comment on Thursday, most speakers were not impressed by Terra-Gen’s pitch.

Michael Evenson of environmental group the Lost Coast League pointed out that Terra-Gen is owned by Energy Capital Partners, a private equity firm, which he called a “mega-corporation” that invests in hydraulic fracturing for oil.

“The commitment of the (Terra-Gen) owners isn’t necessarily to renewables, it’s to making money,” Evenson said, saying the company’s admission of “significant unavoidable impacts” gives the commission the opportunity, outright, to reject the project.

Geneva Thompson, associate general counsel for the Yurok Tribe, outlined the invasion upon cultural resources and landscapes, saying the project would harm the California condor. Tom Wheeler of the Environmental Protection Information Center in Arcata said the project still needs to mitigate for all of its impacts before it could move forward.

A longtime Scotia resident called the turbines a “set of space-aged fans.”

At press time, members of the public were still speaking. Terra-Gen’s next chance to defend itself will be at the Planning Commission’s Nov. 14 meeting.

Source:  Project scaled back from 60 to 47 turbines along ridges | By Shomik Mukherjee | Redwood Times | November 7, 2019 | www.redwoodtimes.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon