LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Fierce criticism as power line inquiry set to close 

Scotland’s most expensive and lengthy public inquiry is set to close tomorrow amid a welter of criticism from environmentalists over its conduct.

The Beauly-Denny Landscape Group, a coalition of six environmental groups including the John Muir Trust and the Ramblers Association, yesterday concluded the Public Local Inquiry into the project had not been fit for purpose, given it will close without ever giving serious consideration to whether the proposed power line from Beauly to Denny is needed in the first place.

Nigel Hawkins, director of the John Muir Trust, said: “This multimillion-pound inquiry has completely failed to scrutinise Scottish and Southern Energy’s (SSE) claim that the 136-pylon line is essential to transporting renewable wind energy from the far north. At no point have clear alternatives to the line such as a sub-sea cable been properly considered.”

The line will require approximately 600 steel lattice towers up to twice the height of the existing line and nearly as tall as the Scott Monument in Edinburgh. The Beauly-Denny Landscape Group is concerned the development will permanently disfigure Scotland’s landscape.

A Scottish Government spokesman challenged the environmentalists’ view of the inquiry.

He said: “The initial sessions of the inquiry dealt with strategic issues and the reporters heard evidence from a number of parties on the need for the line, including the possible use of alternative options such as under-grounding or sub-sea cabling.

“The reporters have heard a great deal of evidence about need and also issues arising from the proposed route of the line at five inquiry sessions. This evidence will be presented to ministers in due course.”

By David Ross
Highland Correspondent

The Herald

19 December 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky