LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Montgomery Co. zoning ordinance sent to commissioners with no recommendation 

Credit:  By Taylor Haggerty | WBAA | www.wbaa.org ~~

Residents in Montgomery County are concerned they’re being left in the dark when it comes to the future of their community. That was the main message during a meeting of the county’s Area Plan Commission Wednesday evening, which included a public hearing on a proposed zoning ordinance.

County commissioners say the zoning ordinance is needed because they’re being threatened with a lawsuit by a wind energy company. Commissioners argue they can’t address some residents’ concerns about wind turbines without a comprehensive plan and zoning in place.

While they passed the county’s first comprehensive plan earlier this month, many residents worry a zoning board would concentrate power in the county.

More than 100 people attended the public hearing. Wind farm opponents wore red, while those in favor of the proposed projects wore blue.

Resident Ben Wilson was one of several who spoke during the public hearing.

“The purpose of zoning is to protect you. My question is, who’s to protect us from the zoning commission?” Wilson asked.

Wilson again spoke out when the commission was preparing to vote. He asked if zoning and wind energy development could be separated, so residents didn’t have to choose one or the other.

Commissioner John Frey says that wasn’t the purpose of the meeting. He says they’re only making a recommendation on the zoning ordinance.

“This is exactly what we’re doing, exactly what the people wanted,” Frey said.

The crowd began to boo and object.

“Yes it is,” Frey said. “Yes it is.”

Residents continued to boo him.

People on both sides of the argument complained that the proposed ordinance feels rushed.

Debbie Lough lives in Sugar Creek Township, in the northeastern part of the county. She says no county officials informed them of the ordinance or asked for their input.

“I would like to keep our township voice. And if we have zoning, we won’t have our township voice anymore,” Lough says.

Brock Ervin is a supporter of wind farms in Montgomery County, and stood outside the city building with a sign reading “I heart wind energy” before the meeting. He says he wants wind and zoning to be treated as separate issues, and thinks zoning for the entire county shouldn’t be up to commissioners.

“So we’re going to have two elected officials, one that’s not, and I don’t think this vote belongs to them,” Ervin says.

Plan Commission member Lynn Ringis says she still has a lot of questions about the ordinance; the draft they received at the meeting had been revised just that morning, and it was her first time seeing it.

“You feel like you need to go back and wrap your head around this one more time, and it’s very stressful,” Ringis says.

A vote to recommend the ordinance for passage failed; the commission then voted 7-1 to send the proposed ordinance to the commissioners with no recommendation either supporting or opposing it. County Council President Terry Hockersmith was the only vote against the motion.

Commissioners will discuss the ordinance at their first meeting in May.

The county attorney says if commissioners approve the rule, it will come to the commission again. But if commissioners reject it, the ordinance is dropped.

Source:  By Taylor Haggerty | WBAA | www.wbaa.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky