LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Supreme Court visits Forest City for hearing 

Credit:  Posted By: Kaleb Gillock | KIMT | Apr. 3, 2019 | www.kimt.com ~~

FOREST CITY, Iowa – It is not something you see every day. Tuesday night in Forest City, the Iowa Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two companion cases at the Boman Fine Arts Center. Companion cases are those that involve similar parties, common facts, and questions of law that are related.

The Mathis v. Iowa Utilities Board, et al. and Mathis, et al. v. Palo Alto County Board of Supervisors, et al. hearing was just what the new building in Forest City was intended for as it was open to the public. These particular cases hit close to home for all Iowans.

“In 2017, we found out that they were going to put up a few wind turbines,” said Bertha Mathis. “Then we found out it was going to be 170 of them.”

Mathis and her husband are up in arms, standing ground for Iowans who do not want wind turbines near their homes – or at least a large quantity of them – calling it a failure on the Iowa Utilities Board.

“The vision statement says that they are the expert in utilities and they have abdicated their responsibility to 99 county supervisors throughout Iowa who are not experts in energy,” Mathis told KIMT.

While the court will continue to deliberate and attempt to resolve the issue in the coming months, Tuesday night was a valuable learning experience for the community.

“I hope they understand constitutionally, especially in America today…we really need to support our constitutions.”

Bertha can rest assured that those in attendance took something away from watching the hearing as many were talking about it when exiting the building.

Source:  Posted By: Kaleb Gillock | KIMT | Apr. 3, 2019 | www.kimt.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky