LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

You can’t win a ‘David and Goliath’ battle against wind farm giants, farmers told 

Credit:  Brown and Co meeting discusses Orsted and Vattenfall Norfolk wind farm cables | Chris Hill | Eastern Daily Press | 14 February 2019 | www.edp24.co.uk ~~

Norfolk landowners must accept they are in a “David versus Goliath” battle when negotiating with wind farm developers who want to dig cables across their property.

This was one of the key messages for farmers and rural professionals at a series of spring update seminars run across East Anglia this week by agri-business and land agents from Brown and Co.

The meeting heard that Norfolk will see a proliferation of major infrastructure projects in the coming years including roads, electricity cables and gas pipelines – with the electricity transmission from offshore wind farm projects being a particular concern.

Currently, two major developments are being planned with vast onshore cable corridors criss-crossing the county – from Weybourne to Swardeston for Danish firm Orsted’s Hornsea Three project, and from Happisburgh to Necton for Swedish energy company Vattenfall.

Jonathan Rush, a partner in the land agency at Brown and Co’s Norwich office, said these were nationally-important projects supporting the government’s renewable energy targets – so rather than trying to fight the inevitable, landowners should start negotiating as soon as possible to get the best deal from the Development Consent Order (DCO) process.

“It is David versus Goliath, it really is,” he said. “These are huge multinational companies developing these schemes, and our government needs them to work, so it is about accepting that it is actually going to happen, and accepting that it is not fair on you or your clients. Once you can accept that it is all about the greater good, and not letting any one individual stand in the way of progress, then you can move on and do a deal.

“The key points we have to work through is negotiating what the payments are going to be, how they are going to access the land and do the works, measuring crop loss and any loss of contracts.

“We have to look beyond the immediate cable or piece of pipe that’s going to come through your land. It is a much bigger picture.”

Mr Rush said a crucial consideration was ensuring soil and drainage was protected and re-instated correctly after the works – and he gave one example of a “horror story” where the damage was so severe it resulted in a £50,000 claim for loss of topsoil.

“Civil engineers are not farmers, and they have a single purpose – they want to get the job done cheaply and quickly and they don’t care what they do to your soil,” he said.

“Nature has taken thousands of years to make it, and contractors will come and destroy it in a matter of minutes.

“The important thing is, however your deal is worded, and whoever you use as an agent, you have got to be willing to stand up to angry contractors, and say: ‘Stop, you are causing a large amount of damage’.”

Other topics discussed at the meetings in Wymondham, Holt and King’s Lynn this week included trends in the land market, changes to abstraction licencing and the efficiency lessons which could be learned from farmers in Australia.

Source:  Brown and Co meeting discusses Orsted and Vattenfall Norfolk wind farm cables | Chris Hill | Eastern Daily Press | 14 February 2019 | www.edp24.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon