LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Shock as Scottish Government approves plan for hugely unpopular Perthshire windfarm 

Credit:  By Jamie Buchan | The Courier | January 21 2019 | www.thecourier.co.uk ~~

The Scottish Government has approved highly controversial plans for a major wind farm in rural Perthshire, despite widespread opposition from hundreds of residents and organisations.

Developers have been battling for more than a decade to install a series of giant turbines at Greenscares, between Comrie and Braco.

The nine-turbine Strathallan Wind Farm project was rejected by councillors in April 2017, after more than 400 complaints. Among those who objected Gleneagles Hotel management and the head of an exclusive Perthshire estate used in the TV show Outlander.

The scheme was lodged several years after a similar four-turbine plan for the same site was refused.

Projects leaders defended the scheme, claiming a larger-scale development was actually better for the area.

But opponents – including five community councils – claim the wind farm would destroy the landscape and hit tourism.

Conservative councillor Murray Lyle – now council leader – said in 2017 developers were attempting to “defend the indefensible.”

The Scottish Government’s planning and environmental appeals division has overturned the council’s decision and granted planning consent in a move that has surprised and baffled opponents.

Appeals reporter Scott Ferrie, who visited the site as part of his investigation, said the development would not be “over-bearing”, “out of scale” or “dominant” from various viewpoints.

He also said it would not impact several historic landmarks, including Ardoch, one of Scotland’s best preserved Roman forts which is within two miles. Many fear the turbines could “compromise” the setting of the ancient site.

Mr Ferrie wrote: “I am aware that planning permission was refused on appeal for four turbines… in January 2010. It may seem counter-intuitive to some to now grant permission for a scheme of nine turbines on the same site, albeit at a slightly reduced height.

“However, each proposal must be determined on its own merits and I am satisfied that a number of material differences between the two cases justify a different outcome in this case.”

Bill Thomson, of Braco and Greenloaning Community C0uncil, described it as a “rogue” decision.

He said: “It’s just bizarre. Completely outrageous.

“All the objections and concerns are still valid. They haven’t changed since this process began.

“We can’t understand this decision at all. I haven’t met anyone who is not extremely disappointed.”

SNP councillor Tom Gray, who previously said he was “appalled” by the project, said he was surprised by the Scottish Government’s assessment.

“I never could understand the developer’s claim that a larger wind farm would be better,” he said.

In its objection, Gleneagles claimed the scheme could impact on the “overall tourism offer” in Perthshire. A spokesman said there were “serious concerns” about the growing number of wind projects in the area.

Mike Aldridge, factor of the 61,000-acre Drummond Estate which was used in the hit series Outlander, said that future film crews would be put off by the turbines.

Unusually, both Perth and Kinross Council and Green Cat Renewables had claimed for expenses. Mr Ferrie has rejected both claims, stating that neither side appeared to have acted unreasonably.

Source:  By Jamie Buchan | The Courier | January 21 2019 | www.thecourier.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky