LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]




Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

BLM rejects massive wind farm along California-Nevada border 

Credit:  By Henry Brean | Las Vegas Review-Journal | November 30, 2018 | www.reviewjournal.com ~~

Federal regulators have knocked the wind out of another renewable energy project planned for the desert west of Searchlight.

The Bureau of Land Management has decided to reject a Sweden-based energy company’s application to build more than 200 turbines, each the height of a skyscraper, along a 22-mile stretch of the Nevada-California border.

The project would have covered more than 32,500 acres of public land adjacent to two wilderness areas in Nevada and the Mojave National Preserve and Castle Mountains National Monument in California.

In a written statement, the agency said it identified “multiple issues and concerns” with the Crescent Peak Wind Energy Project, including the disruption of aviation radar systems and potential impacts to mining claims and the “visual landscape” of the area.

Rudy Evenson, spokesman for the BLM in Nevada, confirmed the decision on Friday, but he could not say who made it or when. He referred additional questions to the Department of Interior’s main public information office in Washington, D.C., which did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

Eolus, the company behind the project, also did not respond to requests for comment.

Company officials previously said the wind farm would generate as much as 500 megawatts of electricity, enough for up to 125,000 homes, and produce 200 to 400 construction jobs and 20 to 40 permanent operational jobs.

“We’re just ecstatic,” said Kevin Emmerich, cofounder of the Nevada environmental group Basin and Range Watch. “We always thought this was a renewable energy project that was inappropriately sited.”

The group wasn’t alone. More than a dozen conservation groups came out against Eolus’ plans, as did a large contingent of Searchlight residents who turned out for a public meeting in April.

They raised concerns about the number of eagles that would be killed by the spinning blades and the miles of new roads that would have to be cut through the eastern edge of one of the largest Joshua tree forests in the world. They also worried that the turbines would spoil their pristine desert views and diminish dark night skies with their the blinking red warning lights.

In its statement, the BLM said it initially determined that the project did not conform with its resource management plan for Southern Nevada, but the agency decided to review it anyway rather than reject it outright.

Unrelated plans for another, smaller wind farm near Searchlight were abandoned by a different developer last year in the face of strong local opposition, including legal action brought against the BLM for approving that proposal.

Basin and Range Watch played an integral part in blocking that earlier wind development. Now Emmerich is calling on the BLM to head off any future renewable proposals west of Searchlight by adopting a resource plan amendment that would permanently protect the desert there.

“The area is too special for this kind of development,” he said.

Source:  By Henry Brean | Las Vegas Review-Journal | November 30, 2018 | www.reviewjournal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Victories


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky