LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Generating opposition 

Financial and practical support is being drummed up in Central Otago to oppose the Project Hayes and Mahinerangi wind farm developments through appeals to the Environment Court.

The Upland Landscape Protection Society (ULPS) and Maniototo Environmental Society (MES) held a meeting in Alexandra last night to garner support for appeals against the developments, which have received resource consent.

About 35 people were welcomed to the meeting by Central Otago artist Grahame Sydney, who said the push to industrialise the landscapes of the district must be stopped.

ULPS spokesman Dr Richard Reeve said a combined ‘‘Save Central’’ campaign for both appeals would be driven by the societies until initial court dates in April and May next year.

With each appeal expected to cost at least $80,000, people were being encouraged to give money and pledge practical support to a trust fund set up through a website.

‘‘We need to fight hard because the two wind farm companies are moving very quickly. It’s a David-and-Goliath battle, and we just have the generosity of individuals that find this obscenity so uninspiring that they want to throw their money at it,’’ Dr Reeve said.

Trust fund money would be divided proportionally to each appeal, based on the number of proposed wind turbines for each development, with Project Hayes expected to comprise 176 and Mahinerangi up to 100.

Dr Reeve said the proposals would ‘‘take out the soul’’ of Central Otago if allowed, and would set a dangerous precedent for further windfarm development proposals in the area.

He would not disclose the amount of money already generated for the appeals, but said people had also become support parties to each appeal submission, and others had until December 22 to do so.

The societies wanted to hear ideas for raising money, and hoped to afford top-level representation in court.

By Rosie Manins

The Otago Daily Times

5 December 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky