Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
DeKalb County hearing officer recommends approval for wind ordinance
Credit: By Katie Finlon | Daily Chronicle | October 23, 2018 | www.daily-chronicle.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
SYCAMORE – A DeKalb County hearing officer is not recommending any changes to setback requirements in the county’s draft wind energy ordinance, but thinks other regulations should be less restrictive.
The approval recommendation from hearing officer Dale Clark will be considered Wednesday night during the Planning and Zoning Committee meeting. The recommendation comes after Clark heard hours of related comment during two public hearings Sept. 24.
Clark said he is recommending the turbine setback to stay at least six times the turbines’ height away from neighboring properties. He said a wind energy development company could work around those restrictions by proposing a wind farm with shorter turbines, or seeking waivers from neighboring properties, according to Friday county documents.
Clark acknowledged that Concerned Citizens for DeKalb County, the group opposing the plans of wind developer EDF Renewable Energy, wanted a minimum setback of 6,652 feet, or 13 times the tip height.
“The effect of adopting a minimum 6,652 property line setback irrespective of tip height would inhibit [wind energy conversion system] production unreasonably,” Clark wrote in the recommendation.
Clark said in his recommendation that a zero-effect shadow flicker rule would be unreasonable to mandate for wind energy developers, since the county has not required the same for other agriculture businesses. He also said sound limitations are extreme and don’t take into account ordinary night sounds including trains, traffic or ordinary wind noise.
The committee meeting will begin at 6:30 p.m. Wednesday in the DeKalb County Health Facility multi-purpose room on North Annie Glidden Road in DeKalb.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
(via Paypal) |
(via Stripe) |
Share: