| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Planning panel sitting in Pirie hears criticism of wind farm proposal
Credit: Greg Mayfield | The Recorder | October 10 2018 | www.portpirierecorder.com.au ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
The proposed multi-million-dollar Neoen wind farm at Crystal Brook would look like “the central business district of Sydney on the hillscape,” a planning assessment panel has been told.
Greg Hatter, represesenting the Hatter farm family at Crystal Brook, said the development would feature 26 of the tallest structures in South Australia.
He was speaking to the State Commission Assessment Panel sitting at the Royal Port Pirie Yacht Club on Wednesday. About 35 people were in the gallery.
The panel is determining its advice to the Planning Minister regarding the project.
The hearing started with a presentation by Garth Heron, of Neoen Australia, who said benefits from the project would be “keeping the lights on and providing 24-hour power to SA at two-thirds of the cost:”
He said that as a result of two years of consultations with the community, the plans had been substantially changed based on feedback.
“We were approached to do the project … a group of landholders came to us with this project … we were selected as preferred partner,” he said.
He said the project had now “shrunk” to the “smallest possible footprint” that would enable connection to the nearby 275KV power line.
Grant McKenzie, of Port Pirie Regional Council, then told how the council had voted against the project at its June meeting and had submitted questions to the company.
He said the council wanted to preserve the landscape of the Flinders Ranges and was concerned about noise levels.
Mr Hatter introduced himself as representing his parents and the family of the Hatters who looked down on a valley where the project would be set up.
Referring to papers before the panel, he said: “This document doesn’t exist … if it doesn’t exist, why are we talking about it?”
The panel’s Deputy Presiding Member Helen Dyer said the matter was being addressed.
Mr Hatter continued by saying that Sydney had only three buildings that were taller than the proposed development.
“It will be double the height of the Snowtown turbines,” he said.
He said modelling for the towers was inadequate and the specifications for the structures were “misleading and deceptive”, based on his own research with an engineering firm.
He was concerned about “flicker” from the associated solar array, saying it could affect drivers on the Augusta Highway.
A woman who next addressed the panel said her husband had died in a highway crash involving trucks carrying heavy structural material.
She said if access to the site was not planned properly, other families could suffer a similar tragedy.
She also queried whether the proof lodgement fee for the project was received by the due date.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=90186 ]
