LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Cattaraugus County Planning Board to review Farmersville wind law 

Credit:  By Rick Miller | Olean Times Herald | www.oleantimesherald.com ~~

LITTLE VALLEY – Cattaraugus County Planning Board members will review the proposed Farmersville local law on wind energy facilities tonight, as the Farmersville Town Board is poised to approve a 23-page update of its 2007 local law after the county planners’ review.

The 2018 local law would help pave the way for the 120-turbine Alle-Catt Wind Farm by Invenergy, a Chicago-based energy company that hopes to build 23 600-foot wind turbines in Farmersville, and another 34 in Freedom in Cattaraugus County.

Alle-Catt plans 10 additional turbines in Rushford and 29 in Centerville in Allegany County and nine in Arcade in Wyoming County.

Attorneys for Farmersville United, a group of more than 200 residents opposed to the wind turbines, plan to attend the planning board meeting.

One of the attorneys, Ginger Schroder, a Farmersville resident, said she will ask the board not to approve the Farmersville local law because not enough information was provided by the town for an environmental review.

“We believe it is missing important required components,” Schroder said of the environmental assessment form the town sent to county planning board staff for review. Most of the 13 pages were not completed.

Schroder said the planning board can either approve the law with no comments, send it back to the Farmersville Town Board with comments or reject it outright.

If the county planning board does anything less than full approval, the local law needs town board approval by a supermajority – four of the five board members, Schroeder said.

The Freedom Town Board held a public hearing and voted on a local wind turbine law favored by Invenergy back in July. The vote was invalid because the town board failed to submit a full environmental review, Schroder said.

Paul Bishop, the county’s senior planner, said Freedom never submitted a State Environmental Quality Review Act document for the wind law. The law was sent back to the town board with an explanation and the county planning board expects Freedom to submit a completed environmental form next month, he said.

“Both towns are feverishly attempting to pass the local laws,” Schroder said.

Freedom’s first vote was invalid because the board failed to make a full referral, she said.

“Farmersville is proceeding down the same path,” Schroder said. The law “is very similar to Freedom’s, which did not do an adequate referral. They did not provide (the county) enough information for review.”

Community groups informed the Farmersville Town Board they considered the referral to the county planning board incomplete and that they would oppose it at tonight’s meeting in Little Valley, Schroder told the Times Herald.

Both town boards are “pandering to the developer” for host community fees and payment in lieu of taxes (P.I.L.O.T.) agreements, Schroder charged.

Schroder recently received copies of email communications between town officials and Invenergy under a Freedom of Information Law (F.O.I.L.) request. “They fought me on giving them to me,” she added.

“There’s a lot of foul play going on here,” Schroder alleges. “Something is not quite right. They are pandering to the requests of the developer for specific things in the local law, not looking out for the health, safety and welfare” of residents.

Schroder suggested town board members had met with Invenergy officials in groups of two to avoid violating the state’s Open Meetings Law. Under the law, if a majority of a board meets, the meeting must be properly publicized and open to the public.

Source:  By Rick Miller | Olean Times Herald | www.oleantimesherald.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon