| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
County committee takes no action on proposed wind ordinance moratorium
Credit: By Kayleigh Rahn | The Tuscola Journal | July 18, 2018 | www.thetuscolajournal.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
The Douglas County Board Plat and Planning Committee opted to take no action in a suggestion to instate an 18-month moratorium regarding wind farm applications, and specifically the proposed Broadland Wind Farm in the northeast corner of the county.
EDP Renewables has worked for nearly a decade to construct the wind farm. However, in recent months, they have been met with resistance from residents of the Newman area who say they could be directly or indirectly affected by the 200-megawatt, 60-turbine site.
Rural Neman resident Paul Freebairn has led the charge for residents against the wind farm who say the proposed infrastructure would infringe on their rights as landowners by causing harm to their health and detrimental decline in their real estate taxes.
In recent weeks, Freebairn submitted a petition including 90 signatures to the county board voicing their concerns of the project and requested the board consider a moratorium on accepting wind farm applications to allow time for the board to review and amend its wind energy ordinance. Freebairn requested the board to consider a 3,000-foot setback from a structure, rather than the current 1,000-foot set back, and a setback from the property line of 3 times the turbine tip height, rather than the current 1 times the turbine tip height.
However, the Plat and Planning Committee of the county board did not entertain the suggestion during its meeting Friday, July 6.
County Board chairman Don Munson said he’s spent a lot of time reviewing the submitted information from both sides of the issue, and he came to conclusion that in the name of fairness he could not support changing the ordinance at this point.
“I can honestly tell you I spent a lot of time going over all that information,” he said. “I am one of the three present board members that was on the board in 2009 when we enacted the ordinance that we are operating under now.”
He said after reviewing current wind energy systems ordinances from throughout state, he does not feel the Douglas County ordinance is lacking. The one significant difference is the topic of setback. Many ordinances require a 1,500-foot set back, while Douglas County’s is 1,000 feet.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=89059 ]
