LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Greenwood to schedule meeting on commercial wind farms 

Credit:  By Alison Aloisio | The Bethel Citizen | July 10, 2018 | www.sunjournal.com ~~

GREENWOOD – Selectmen are expected to schedule a special town meeting to decide on proposed amendments to the town ordinance governing commercial wind farms.

The date of the meeting will likely be set at the board’s next meeting Tuesday, July 17.

On Monday, more than 100 people turned out for a public hearing on the issue. The gathering was dominated by comments in favor of the amendments, which would place much tighter restrictions on wind farms.

One new provision – the height restriction on turbine towers – would effectively ban such projects.

Calpine Corp., based in Houston, is studying the viability of a 13-turbine “Long Mountain Wind Farm” project in the area of Long, Tibbetts and Elwell mountains, near Twitchell Pond. Prompted by the potential development, Greenwood’s Ordinance Review Committee has proposed the updates to the ordinance.

The town’s existing ordinance limits the sound from routine operation of wind turbines to 55 decibels during the daytime and 42 at night at nonparticipating landowner property lines, the same as state guidelines.

Setbacks from property lines are a minimum of 150 percent of the height of the towers. There are no height limits.

A key part of the new proposal includes a recommendation limiting the daytime audible decibel level to 35 during the day and 25 at night.

The Ordinance Review Committee also recommended tower heights be limited to 250 feet (as measured from the tower base to the highest point of any turbine rotor blade, at the highest arc of the blade), and setbacks of 1 mile for every 100 feet of tower height.

Calpine has said its wind facility would likely include 600-foot towers, and the project would require towers that are at least 500 feet tall. In early June, the company hosted a public informational session on the project.

Monday’s town hearing, which lasted almost two hours, featured a page-by-page explanation of key parts of the proposed amendments by Planning Board Chairman Dennis Doyon, who is also a member of the Ordinance Review Committee.

The “complaints” section of the ordinance proposal prompted one of the evening’s longer discussions.

An abutter to the property where Calpine would like to do a project expressed concern about how complaints, particularly noise ones, would be resolved.

Doyon said if a wind company exceeded the ordinance restrictions, it would become an enforcement issue for the town to pursue.

Jessie Frederickson of the Ordinance Review Committee also noted that complaints recorded with Greenwood would be posted online.

Property owner Jake Zagata generally applauded the committee’s work, saying it had given the town the tools to deal with the wind power situation.

“This is an opportunity to get some control in this uncharted area,” he said.

Concerning the financial impact of a project on the town, Calpine earlier this year presented figures on the net property tax revenue Greenwood would gain from a wind farm.

The company also outlined a proposal for a community benefits agreement, under which Greenwood and local organizations would receive money annually from the wind company.

Marie Bartlett, who served many years as a Greenwood selectman, cautioned Monday that the increased town valuation due to a wind farm would result in the loss of state revenue sharing funds and state aid to schools.

She also said the company’s figures do not take into account potential loss of individual property values due to the presence of a wind farm.

“Do you really think that tourists are going to come up especially to look at wind mills?” she asked.

Resident Norm Milliard spoke in support of the amendments. He likened the situation to one 20 years ago, when the town voted to regulate jet skis on its lakes.

“You, the voters chose what you wanted the town of Greenwood to be like as we move toward the future,” he said. “Twenty years later, 2018, the town of Greenwood is at another crossroad,” with an opportunity to choose what it will look like for the next 20 years.

The town’s mountains, he said, are as valuable to Greenwood’s identity as its ponds were in 1998.

Source:  By Alison Aloisio | The Bethel Citizen | July 10, 2018 | www.sunjournal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon