LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Ritchie pushes bills to protect Fort Drum from wind turbine interference 

Credit:  By Gordon Block | March 1, 2018 | www.watertowndailytimes.com ~~

Two new bills in the state Senate are looking to protect Fort Drum from wind turbine interference.

The first of the two proposals, from state Sen. Patricia A. Ritchie, R-Heuvelton, would make a representative of the Department of Defense a non-voting member of the state’s Article X siting board. The second would provide some compensation to farmers in select areas to sign wind turbine leases, an effort that has already been pushed at the federal level.

“Fort Drum certainly is the driver in the economy, and we have to be doing everything in our power to protect them and put them on the strongest footing,” Sen. Ritchie said.

She said the urgency comes as there are multiple wind farm proposals that could put hundreds of turbines in the vicinity of the post. Army officials on Tuesday noted that the post had a direct economic impact of $1.222 billion in the 2017 fiscal year.

“There’s no walking it back once they’re built and there’s a problem,” Sen. Ritchie said. “It’s something we need to deal with now.”

Military officials told the Times in July that turbines can display as planes on their radar, which could overwhelm their system. Their lone option to lessen that effect is blocking all computer tracking in the area of turbines, creating what officials called a “black hole” for viewing air traffic.

For weather operations, Air Force personnel said turbines can contaminate information and create a secondary layer of phony weather data known as a “ghost echo.”

Among those expressing concerns about the impacts of wind turbines are U.S. Rep. Elise M. Stefanik and Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo, and the Fort Drum Regional Liaison Organization has opposed several wind projects near the post.

Wind turbine interference was a key part of the Development Authority of the North Country’s Joint Land Use Study. Among the study’s suggestions was for the military to become an “Interested Party” on the state Siting Board.

The senator said it was important for the military to have a “seat at the table” for Article X discussions given the importance of the decisions for the post.

“We were assured their comments were taken into consideration, but we wanted to make sure that happened,” Sen. Ritchie said.

She said the military representative’s federal status would prevent them from voting on matters before the board.

The farmland proposal has already been undertaken through the Army Compatible Use Buffer program, which has spent millions of dollars to buy the permanent development rights to about two dozen farms covering about 7,000 acres of land. The program, which has received state funds in previous years, targets sites near military activity, avoiding the development of structures that might affect military training or come too close to activity.

Sen. Ritchie said the state-level program could pursue air rights for properties, helpful when considering the radar impacts of certain developments.

“Hopefully that does two things, it preserves open space, and it gives farmers another revenue source,” Sen. Ritchie said.

Sen. Ritchie said she did not have a cost estimate for her proposal, but that there were funds available in the state’s Environmental Protection Fund that could go toward such an effort.

Source:  By Gordon Block | March 1, 2018 | www.watertowndailytimes.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon