LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Debate over Ohio conservatives’ views of renewable energy swirls in wake of poll 

Credit:  Dan Gearino | The Columbus Dispatch | Jan 26, 2018 | www.dispatch.com ~~

Some prominent Ohio Republicans are sparring over renewable-energy policy, with each side claiming to represent conservative Ohioans.

This started on Jan. 10 when the Ohio Conservative Energy Forum, an advocacy group, published poll results showing that a majority of self-identified Ohio conservatives are in favor of policies that support wind, solar and other renewable energy sources.

Two days later, House Majority Leader Bill Seitz, R-Cincinnati, sent a mass email criticizing the poll. He is a leading critic of renewable-energy mandates and subsidies.

“The wind lobby is ramping up its minions to tout a new ‘statewide poll’… purporting to show that conservatives ‘overwhelmingly support clean energy policies,'” he said.

He described the group as “astroturf,” a derisive term for an organization that is concealing ulterior motives.

One by one, he responded to claims made by the poll results, including the core premise that conservative voters overwhelmingly support clean energy policies.

“You bet” they support clean energy, Seitz said in response. “But mandates are not a conservative’s way of getting there. True conservatives use their own money to further policies in which they believe.”

The Ohio Conservative Energy Forum, the group behind the poll, is led by Mike Hartley, a lobbyist who has worked on Republican campaigns for decades, including those of U.S. Rep. Steve Stivers, R-Upper Arlington, and Gov. John Kasich. The group started in 2015 and says it supports all forms of energy, from traditional Ohio sources, such as coal, to renewable sources, such as wind and solar.

On Monday, Hartley sent an open letter to Ohio General Assembly members in response to Seitz’s message.

While beginning by calling Seitz “a tremendous legislator and a very honorable public servant,” the letter continues to say that Seitz “is not aligned with the values and priorities of Ohio conservatives on clean energy policy and its many economic benefits just waiting to be realized.”

Hartley uses some of the poll results to back his point of view, such as the fact that 79 percent of self-identified Ohio conservatives say “they would tell a Republican candidate to support policies that encourage energy efficiency and greater use of renewable energy in the state.”

He notes that the pollster, Public Opinion Strategies, has also done work for the campaign arms of Ohio House and Senate Republicans and has a strong track record.

“I have been working to elect conservative candidates and advance conservative policy in Ohio for nearly 20 years,” he said in the open letter.

“It is unfortunate that Rep. Seitz has chosen to assert that this poll and my efforts to promote it are part of some sort of liberal plot. But I am encouraged and empowered by my fellow conservatives to continue pushing for the economic benefits that await Ohio when we embrace forward-looking clean energy policy.”

This is occurring as the General Assembly is considering several proposals dealing with renewable energy, and as Kasich and business groups say the state’s economy could be harmed if leaders are reluctant to encourage investment in new energy technologies.

Because Republicans hold large majorities in the House and Senate, the outcome on those issues likely will come down to who wins the debate within the party.

Source:  Dan Gearino | The Columbus Dispatch | Jan 26, 2018 | www.dispatch.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky