LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Rep. Saunders files bill for wind farm transparency 

Credit:  By TRAVIS WEIK - Jan 14, 2018 - thecouriertimes.com ~~

State Rep. Tom Saunders (R-Lewisville) submitted a bill Thursday that deals with industrial wind turbines.

More specifically, House Bill 1225 addresses concerns about potential ethics violations between county officials and wind farm developers.

“With so many new wind farms being constructed, this legislation would bolster transparency in our county government and help keep any personal financial interests out of the local approval process for prospective wind farm projects,” Saunders said.

HB 1225 would prevent conflicts of interest for county officials related to local wind farm projects.

Saunders said this legislation would require county officials or family members of county officials with financial interests in wind-powered devices in their county to recuse themselves from any official proceedings on that subject.

“Recuse” is defined in the proposed legislation to mean “refrain entirely from participation in a matter that involves the ownership, operation, construction or location of a wind power device.”

If HB 1225 becomes law in its current form, any county official who has an agreement with a wind developer must recuse himself or herself from any matter that involves the ownership, operation, construction or location of a wind power device in the county.

HB 1225 says that any Henry County official who has a connection to a wind developer could not vote at or even attend a meeting “that involves the ownership, operation, construction or location of a wind power device.”

The proposal also prohibits a county official or a relative of a county official who is subject to this recusal requirement from participating in a meeting in another county where a proposed wind power device is the subject of discussion.

“My bill would also require energy companies to file detailed paperwork and notify, at their expense, all property owners who live near a proposed wind turbine,” Saunders said.

If HB 1225 becomes law, the Henry County Recorder will be required to publish and mail notice to each property owner within two miles of a proposed wind turbine location. The notice will include a copy of the county’s wind energy conversion system ordinance, a copy of the developer’s registration statement, if any, and the name and contact information of a county official to contact with questions about the proposed wind farm development.

The wind farm development copy will be responsible for covering any costs the recorder incurs while complying with the notification requirements.

Wind developers would also need to file several pieces of information with the county clerk if House Bill 1225 becomes law. This includes contact information and a list of county officials that the developer has contacted.

Developers can be fined up to $4,500 for not filing the proper registration paperwork.

HB 1225 is currently in the Committee on Local Government. Saunders is a majority member of that committee.

Last year, Saunders submitted a bill that would have outlined exactly where industrial wind turbines can or cannot be built around the state.

Had that bill become law, local voters would also have had the chance to answer the question “Shall construction and/or location of wind power devices be permitted in Henry County?” during a general election.

Source:  By TRAVIS WEIK - Jan 14, 2018 - thecouriertimes.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky