LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Municipal review finds information lacking in wind farm proposal 

Credit:  Vicki Gough, Special to Postmedia Network | St. Thomas Times-Journal ~~

The Strong Breeze Wind Project plan in Dutton-Dunwich is rife with gaps and deficiencies according to a Toronto-based engineering company.

That and more was detailed in a report made by Morrison Hershfield Ltd. for Dutton-Dunwich council. The engineering report found problems in the draft Renewable Energy Approval (REA) documents to construct a wind farm in Dutton Dunwich.

The municipality retained Morrison Hershfield to evaluate the Strong Breeze Wind Project draft report prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd. for Invenergy.

There is information lacking in that same draft REA submission, according to the Morrison Hershfield report.

That includes inconsistencies between the rated capacity of the two types of turbine models; not enough information on underground electrical line routes; impacts to municipal infrastructure; height of aerial electrical lines; and the anticipated span between support posts.

The report also blasts Invenergy’s methodology, stating “the assessment appears to have been undertaken as a desktop exercise only.”

The municipal study procured by Invenergy stated the company would return the land to preexisting condition or better. But turbine and transformer foundations will only be removed to a depth of approximately one metre despite deeper foundations.

According to the review the REA submission lacks sufficient archaeological, cultural, and natural heritage assessments.

No detailed review was found in the documents for potential impacts the project may have on potable water sources.

Council will include the findings in its municipal consultation form as part of the 90-day municipal review process, as set out in provincial regulations for wind farm proposals.

Over 80 per cent of Dutton-Dunwich property owners have voted against wind farms within their community.

Invenergy wants to construct up to 20 wind turbines in Dutton-Dunwich.

Source:  Vicki Gough, Special to Postmedia Network | St. Thomas Times-Journal

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky