LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

The Hughes County wind farm proposal 

Credit:  We live in a busy place and the Capital Journal is here to help you keep tabs on it [excerpted] | Capital Journal | www.capjournal.com ~~

A California-based energy company has proposed building between 150 and 200 industrial wind turbines in Hughes County to produce and sell electricity. These turbines will stand between 400 and 500 feet high and generate some tax revenue, as well as lease payments to local landowners, many of whom are farmers and ranchers.

The extra money sounds great, but there are hidden costs to everything. In this case, as in many other wind-farm proposals, neighbors are beginning to turn on one another. Not everyone likes the idea of industrial wind turbines filling the landscape. Certainly, there are some aesthetic concerns but, more practically, those folks opposed to the wind farm have legitimate business and health concerns.

No one has a good handle on what, if any, impact wind turbines have on pheasants. A few studies have been published but all of them are fairly recent and have had mixed results. This is a problem because the land in and around Hughes County is now the state’s second-best pheasant-producing region and there are a lot of folks who make part of their living selling pheasant hunts.

It is understandable then, that those folks would be concerned about the construction of devices that are known to kill hundreds-of-thousands of birds annually. Those birds are mostly migratory birds to be sure, but the pheasant-hunting operations’ concerns are still valid.

The wind-farm proposal is a thorny issue, one that the Capital Journal has and will continue to dedicate resources to covering.

Source:  We live in a busy place and the Capital Journal is here to help you keep tabs on it [excerpted] | Capital Journal | www.capjournal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky