LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

‘High Court will protect us from wind farm invasion’ 

Credit:  By Helen Bruce | Irish Daily Mail | 4 September 2017 | ~~

Campaigners against wind farms have said they believe the High Court will protect them from an ‘invasion’ of turbines.

The Meath Wind Information Group said it was ‘disgusted but not surprised’ that North Meath Wind Farm Ltd has launched a High Court challenge, after it was refused permission for a large plant near Kells.

The wind farm company claimed An Bord Pleanála had overestimated the impact 25 turbines would have on landmarks such as the Hill of Tara. It argued that An Bord Pleanála had made mistakes in arriving at its decision to deny planning permission.

It won permission from the court last week to seek to compel the board to reconsider its decision.

Pádraic Dolan, of the Meath Wind Information Group, said his organisation was confident that any challenge would be unsuccessful. He told the Irish Daily Mail that the planning board had been unequivocal in its refusal, citing the proximity of the wind farm to a large number of homes, and the landscape’s cultural significance. ‘The board noted that current guidelines are unfit to be applied to wind turbines that will be over 600 feet tall,’ he added.

Mr Dolan concluded: ‘We are hopeful that the purpose of the High Court is to protect communities from just such invasions.’

Counsel for North Meath Wind Farm Ltd, Jarlath Fitzsimons SC, argued in court last week that the board had erred in finding that the local landscape ‘overwhelmingly’ consisted of farmland. And he said the board had concluded that the wind farm ‘would have a much greater impact on a number of cultural and heritage sites than it will actually have’.

He said the company had, in its application, given consideration to guidelines from the International Council on Monuments and Sites.

He added that a previous application by North Meath Wind Farm Ltd for a 46-turbine farm had been refused by An Bord Pleanála, and that no challenge had been brought over that. Instead, a fresh application for 25 turbines was made.

Ms Justice Mary Faherty ruled that the company had made a strong enough case for her to grant leave for it to seek a judicial review of An Bord Pleanála’s decision. The case will return to the High Court in a number of weeks, when the planning board will give its response.

Source:  By Helen Bruce | Irish Daily Mail | 4 September 2017 |

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon