LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm decision-day 'madness' 

A decision to consider a wind farm application three weeks before a public inquiry into plans to erect turbines on a neighbouring site has been branded “madness”.

Campaigners and Alan Beith MP have called for the Wandylaw bid – due to be discussed on October 23 – to be delayed until after the public inquiry into the Middlemoor proposals.

A planning inspector will start hearing the arguments for and against 18 turbines at Middlemoor on November 13.

Campaigners fear that if Berwick Borough Council decides the plans for 10 turbines at Wandylaw before the inquiry it could set a precedent. And they say it would be better to hear all the applications for wind farms in north Northumberland together.

But Wandylaw developer RidgeWind welcomed the decision to hold the meeting before the inquiry.

A public inquiry has to be held for Middlemoor because Alnwick District Council objected to npower renewables’ application. Wandylaw is able to be decided by the borough council due to its size.

Dominic Coupe, chairman of the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) Northumberland, said: “It seems extraordinary that one wind farm site that’s next door to another is going to a public inquiry which will begin in November.

“To go ahead with even thinking about taking it to the planning committee at this stage seems madness.

“The sensible decision for the borough council’s planning committee is to defer it until after the Middlemoor public inquiry and until after they have looked at the Arup study.

“There is a danger that it could set a precedent and it is an enormous shame that such huge pressure is being put on the borough council’s planning committee to make this decision.

By Jaclyn Curry

Northumberland Gazette

11 October 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky