LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Scottish wind farm refused over aviation concerns 

Credit:  29 August 2017 by Winnie Agbonlahor | www.planningresource.co.uk ~~

A council in Scotland has refused planning permission for a nine-turbine wind farm after planners warned that the scheme could pose a risk to aviation.

Developer Brookfield Renewable UK Limited had applied to East Ayrshire Council for permission to build nine 100-metre high wind turbines on a 468-hectare site at Drogan, south of Sinclairston and east of Rankinston.

National Air Traffic Services (NATS) lodged an objection to the scheme over concerns that the turbines could interfere with local air traffic control radars, which, planning officers said in their report, Brookfield had not addressed sufficiently.

According to the report, Brookfield argued that the council should approve the wind farm with a planning condition to ensure that no development would take place until an appropriate aviation mitigation solution had been implemented.

However, planners argued that it seemed unlikely such a solution would be found given the applicant has had more than two years to work on mitigation measures.

“The council has been reasonable to the applicant and has, twice now, delayed taking the application to planning committee for determination,” the report said.

An update with mitigation proposals provided by Brookfield on 26 July, the report added, were “not sufficiently mature to provide NATS with any confidence of their suitability and potential for eventual implementation.”

Planners acknowledged that the majority of material considerations are “supportive of the development,” which would would bring economic benefits and “directly help tackle climate change”.

But officers concluded that the scheme would be contrary to government policy and the area’s development plan “given the outstanding aviation objection from NATS due to the lack of mitigation solutions to address the aviation impacts of the proposed development”.

Source:  29 August 2017 by Winnie Agbonlahor | www.planningresource.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky