LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind energy an expensive alternative 

Credit:  Letter: Wind energy an expensive alternative | Argus Leader | May 9, 2017 | www.argusleader.com ~~

Consumers want to believe wind energy is cheap because the wind is free. However, harnessing the wind is an expensive proposition.

First of all, the cost of the towers in $2-to-$3 million each. The power then has to be moved, which requires overhead transmission lines at $1 million per mile. In addition, a gas or coal powered generator usually must be built to power up when the wind stops. Developers will base their projections on 100 percent capacity. The problem with that is wind power generally averages 30 percent capacity.

Wind energy isn’t cheap to China. Mining and refining rare earth minerals required for the 1,000-to-2,000 pound turbine magnets leaves large areas of productive land toxic for residents.

It isn’t cheap for participating land owners who have given-up their land rights for 50 years or more. They may or may not profit from this arrangement which will likely change every five years or so.

It isn’t cheap for the communities where heavy equipment damages roads and fields, fractures relationships, and residential property values decrease the tax base.

Finally, wind energy isn’t cheap for consumers. According to our local electric cooperatives, the more wind energy they add to their portfolio, the higher your electric rates go.

When you read or hear all the hype about how great wind energy is just remember it’s being generated by investors and developers who hope to profit from this industry.

Deanna Brouwer, Beresford

Source:  Letter: Wind energy an expensive alternative | Argus Leader | May 9, 2017 | www.argusleader.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky